Children absorb their surroundings in order to understand and interact with society; therefore, children emulate those who are close to them. Zack asserts, “Children of the poor are therefore likely to grow up with different values, different ideas of what is important in life, from the middle-class children.” For example, if a child has parents with less education, then that child will not have the same educational priorities or experiences as a child with highly educated parents. Going off of that...
Oni and Winant acknowledge that since 1965 and the civil rights legislation the black community has been stratified into a small privileged class and a massive black under-class, which is regulated to permanent marginality. Groups that have a history of a lower class often remain in lower classes because of their ‘life chances’ and the fact that it is difficult to pull oneself up by ones bootstraps. Instead, citizens are partially dependent on our governmental system for support. However, our governmental system and political figures are reliant on re-election. Polls show, educated older citizens are more likely to vote in elections; therefore, politicians support legislation like the continuation of an unsustainable social security system because it is important to their voter base. This becomes problematic when attempting to combat class hierarchy and racial issues because politicians are constantly worried about being re-elected, so they tend not to take risks or upset their voter base; therefore, the pertinent issues our nation faces concerning race and class are often set aside.
In my GOV111 class last spring, we talked about affirmative action programs in terms of the difference between programs that pursue "equality of outcome" vs. programs that pursue "equality of opportunity."
ReplyDeleteRacial quotas and similar programs are examples of equality of outcome (ie. it doesn't matter who the top ten most qualified candidates for the position are, you must have at least 3 African Americans and 2 Asians).
Programs (like Project Head Start) that try to get to the root of the social inequality problems are called "equality of opportunity" programs.
In my opinion, although current efforts are commendable, this country needs exponentially more programs encouraging equality of opportunity because the social environment in some racially charged areas seems to weed out candidates before they can even become candidates for "equality of outcome" positions.